On Fri, 19 Jul 2013, Todd C. Miller wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 21:02:41 +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > Switching the processing order in getmntname() fixes the behavior. > > Can anybody think of something that would be broken by this? > > I can't see any reason not do to this. I'm sure you were trying > for a minimal diff but doesn't it make more sense to make the loop > more like the one in umountall()?
This looks good to me; I've verified that the only real change is the loop direction and the bulk of the bits are just mechanical 'i' to 'n'. ok guenther@
