On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 09:19:44PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote: > You can see that nodes have been added by the tree transformation called > "foo 1", "two" and "two 1". The "foo 1" node would have been blocked > by the other node called "node", and "two" and "two 1" would have been > blocked by each other (as there are two sections called "two", neither > of which has a @node).
I meant the other node called "foo", not "node".
