Micha? Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for fixing the previous bug I reported. Sadly, I just managed to
> accidentally find another one. When ACL mask restricts effective ACL
> entries, getfacl(1) reports the effective permissions as a comment,
> e.g.:
>
> user:nobody:rw- #effective:r--
>
> It seems that GNU tar writes that comment as part of the pax header,
> and e.g. libarchive does not restore the ACL correctly.
>
Interesting, before I thought this code has been created by "looking at" the
original implementation from "star", but I did not understand why GNU tar
incorrectly leaves default ACLs on files that have been archived without ACLs.
Now it is obvious that the code has been written without looking at the
original implementation....
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.net (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.org/private/ http://sf.net/projects/schilytools/files/'
