Pavel Raiskup <prais...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 20, 2017 1:41:38 PM CET Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > There still is a --acl option but no support for ACLs.
>
> There's no support for NTFS/NFSv4 ACLs in GNU tar, to un-confuse the
> statement.
But the withdrawn POSIX.4 ACL interface proposal does not seem to be supported
either.
I am on a system that sports both - depending on the underlying filesystem.
BTW: With regard to the NTFS/NFSv4 ACLs, I recently enhanced star to use a more
compact ACL format in this case.
Here is what the old definition was:
30 atime=1383676106.725425278
30 ctime=1383676333.651257344
30 mtime=1383676106.725425278
324
SCHILY.acl.ace=group:daemon:rwx-----------:-------:allow:12,user:root:rwx-----------:-------:allow:0,owner@:--x-----------:-------:deny,owner@:rw-p---A-W-Co-:-------:allow,group@:-wxp----------:-------:deny,group@:r-------------:-------:allow,everyone@:-wxp---A-W-Co-:-------:deny,everyone@:r-----a-R-c--s:-------:allow
23 SCHILY.dev=47775747
17 SCHILY.ino=11
18 SCHILY.nlink=1
27 SCHILY.filetype=regular
and here is the new compact format:
30 atime=1383676106.725425278
30 ctime=1383676333.651257344
30 mtime=1383676106.725425278
186
SCHILY.acl.ace=group:daemon:rwx::allow:12,user:root:rwx::allow:0,owner@:x::deny,owner@:rwpAWCo::allow,group@:wxp::deny,group@:r::allow,everyone@:wxpAWCo::deny,everyone@:raRcs::allow
23 SCHILY.dev=47775747
17 SCHILY.ino=11
18 SCHILY.nlink=1
27 SCHILY.filetype=regular
that usually fits in a single 512 byte block.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.net (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.org/private/ http://sf.net/projects/schilytools/files/'
