-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 12/08/2015 01:59 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote: > Nak. As far as I can tell this fs isn't going anywhere, nor should > it IMO.
While I agree that it isn't really going anywhere and it is a bit silly that a handful of people are still clinging to it, but it *does* exist, *some* people do use it, and so parted can at least detect it ( it is very easy after all ). This and one or two other filesystems I have been meaning to add detection support for for some time now, so that gparted can stop carrying workarounds to detect them. There are plenty of esoteric, barely used things that we still support so I don't see why we should refuse this one. Would you reconsider your nak? I mean it really doesn't hurt to add the very simple detection code, especially when someone else has gone to the trouble of writing it. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJWa1+sAAoJEBB5UWFcu6UWBzgH/igQNXcnuixhTZV82C4/7hit zBUasVBHI2+dy1yUefBF2QXrS5+FBdzeGHSMMi52oVGlYEDxWs9vw1cBV5BlCchE 8yI+4+f1rgBFlEmf5aZXmuYWMXMorSE2ZWcDd6x5q+xRP4NCq9MwHkszzTWYvmm3 eTDycb5whkK4qMKtLPGxepqXa+RMpZ6S8+76sX9k20w4mBQlolE5uQTfGFFaJE0j K2jnFRgaA8hF1bHqdG9Njd69M2wetWoABDPQwEQXceXVFt+YwJWv4bUoa4CHeWX1 BZzbzozX7UDlae1lYD974ailBJjctcFbNW9qzb+mwGJTQAj/+wNQqwz6A35We1c= =HApm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
