Hello! It is me again. About the email named "parted_1G_extended_error_bug" of last time, I think about it and get the following guess: The unit "G" is too inaccurate，or I should say its adjustment range is too large, so I must use "MB" for best. Maybe it is too sample what I say, but I hope to know if I use unit "MB" how accurate can I get in different FS_TYPE, LABEL_TYPE and so on.
I have another question, if I parted the primary partition or logical partition at the same site, for example from 1G to 2G. Does it get the same "start" and "end" value? I think if it is not, what is the reason of the difference in your code, and the connection of the value between primary and logical. >From what I say, you can know I want to get the last value of the "start" and "end" of a partition. Could you tell me a function in the parted's lib that can do this better. The source code is too long I have no much time to read all of it, but I need to use it for a project. I hope you wish to give me a suggest and prompt. Hope your help. Thank you very much. From： ZR_Lang 2010.09.02
_______________________________________________ bug-parted mailing list bug-parted@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted
