Petr Uzel wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 04:00:08PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> >>
>> >> -AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION([0.15])
>> >> +AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION([0.18])
>> >
>> > Shouldn't this be [0.17] ? ^^^^
>>
>> Good catch. Thanks.
>>
>> That would make it match the log.
>> Would my requiring 0.18 cause trouble for you personally?
>
> SUSE, which I use on my development system, has gettext-0.17 and won't
> update it anytime soon (we are in version freeze for 11.3).
>
> So sticking to gettext-0.17 would make it easier for me, but if you
> decide to require 0.18, I'll cope with that.
0.17 isn't bad, so I'll push this shortly:
>From b8c160b2e7513fe6cb82ebcd21f6b4ee28cc1b5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering <meyer...@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 16:32:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] build: really use gettext-0.17
* configure.ac: Correct previous change to use 0.17, not 0.18,
since gettext-0.18 is new enough that it makes building from git
a little too inconvenient. Spotted by Petr Uzel.
---
configure.ac | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 9ae5783..a994d09 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ libraries.)
fi
AM_PROG_LIBTOOL
-AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION([0.18])
+AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION([0.17])
AM_GNU_GETTEXT([external])
if test "$USE_INCLUDED_LIBINTL" = "yes"; then
AC_MSG_ERROR([
--
1.7.1.348.gb26ba
_______________________________________________
bug-parted mailing list
bug-parted@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted
