Hi,
I'd like to suggest the attached two patches:
(1) patch-01-test-scripting:
without this the test failed.
(2) patch-02-check-programs:
I am fairly sure you don't want to install the two test programs 'disk' and
'label' (they are not mentioned under %files in parted.spec). Thus they
ought to be declared as check_PROGRAMS instead of bin_PROGRAMS.
Regards
Peter Breitenlohner <p...@mppmu.mpg.de>
diff -ur parted-1.9.0.orig/tests/t7000-scripting.sh
parted-1.9.0/tests/t7000-scripting.sh
--- parted-1.9.0.orig/tests/t7000-scripting.sh 2009-07-23 19:52:08.000000000
+0200
+++ parted-1.9.0/tests/t7000-scripting.sh 2009-07-30 12:03:17.000000000
+0200
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
{ emit_superuser_warning
sed s/Error/Warning/ errS
- printf 'Is this still acceptable to you?\nYes/No?'; } >> errI || fail=1
+ printf 'Is this still acceptable to you?\nYes/No? n\n'; } >> errI || fail=1
for mkpart in mkpart mkpartfs; do
Only in parted-1.9.0: autom4te.cache
diff -ur parted-1.9.0.orig/libparted/tests/Makefile.am
parted-1.9.0/libparted/tests/Makefile.am
--- parted-1.9.0.orig/libparted/tests/Makefile.am 2009-07-23
19:52:08.000000000 +0200
+++ parted-1.9.0/libparted/tests/Makefile.am 2009-07-30 13:34:24.000000000
+0200
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
TESTS = t1000-label.sh t2000-disk.sh
EXTRA_DIST = $(TESTS)
-bin_PROGRAMS = label disk
+check_PROGRAMS = label disk
LDADD = \
$(top_builddir)/libparted/libparted.la \
_______________________________________________
bug-parted mailing list
bug-parted@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted
