On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 02:25:25PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 02:22:19PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > Hi Paul! > > > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 01:44:19AM -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > > > I've implemented a new capability for conditional assignments (not > > > pushed yet). > > > > > > After these changes, a "?" can precede any type of assignment > > > operation, not just "=", and make it conditional (that is, it only > > > takes effect if the variable is not already set). > > > > > > So for example, in addition to "?=" which creates a recursive variable > > > if the variable is not set yet, GNU Make will support "?:=" which > > > creates a simple variable if the variable is not set yet. > > > > Thanks!! > > > > > Of course if > > > it's already set then the right-hand side of the assignment is not > > > expanded. > > > > > > Similarly the assignments "?::=" and "?:::=" are also supported. > > > > > > > > > There is one question I wanted to ask for opinions on: what should we > > > do with the "?+=" operator? > > > > There's a use for it: appending to a variable if it wasn't set in the > > environment (ignoring what happened in the Makefile). > > > > Here's what += does: > > > > alx@debian:~/tmp$ cat Makefile > > var ?= foo > > var += bar > > $(info $(var)) > > alx@debian:~/tmp$ make > > foo bar > > make: *** No targets. Stop. > > alx@debian:~/tmp$ make var=foo > > foo > > make: *** No targets. Stop. > > alx@debian:~/tmp$ var=foo make > > foo bar > > make: *** No targets. Stop. > > Sorry for reusing "foo". I'll rewrite with quux, which will be clearer. > > alx@debian:~/tmp$ cat Makefile > var ?= foo > var += bar > $(info $(var)) > alx@debian:~/tmp$ make > foo bar > make: *** No targets. Stop. > alx@debian:~/tmp$ make var=quux > quux > make: *** No targets. Stop. > alx@debian:~/tmp$ var=quux make > quux bar > make: *** No targets. Stop. > > > > > And here's what ?+= could do: > > alx@debian:~/tmp$ cat Makefile > var ?= foo > var += bar
D'oh! I can't write an email without typos.
var ?+= bar
> $(info $(var))
> alx@debian:~/tmp$ make
> foo bar
> make: *** No targets. Stop.
> alx@debian:~/tmp$ make var=quux
> quux
> make: *** No targets. Stop.
> alx@debian:~/tmp$ var=quux make
> quux
> make: *** No targets. Stop.
>
> > alx@debian:~/tmp$ cat Makefile
> > var ?= foo
> > var ?+= bar
> > $(info $(var))
> > alx@debian:~/tmp$ make-9000
> > foo bar
> > make: *** No targets. Stop.
> > alx@debian:~/tmp$ make-9000 var=foo
> > foo
> > make: *** No targets. Stop.
> > alx@debian:~/tmp$ var=foo make-9000
> > foo
> > make: *** No targets. Stop.
> >
> > In the last case (environment variable), since var was set, ?+= would do
> > nothing, unlike +=.
> >
>
> --
> <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
> Looking for a remote C programming job at the moment.
--
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
Looking for a remote C programming job at the moment.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
