Follow-up Comment #10, bug #61226 (project make):
[comment #9 comment #9:]
> I will leave this issue open to think about how to best introduce a
backward-incompatible change that might help in this situation.
Do i understand it correctly, that as long as compatibility allows, you'd like
make to fail whenever make cannot include a makefile, as long as the included
makefile has a rule with a recipe, even empty?
i'd like to mention that en empty recipe in a force rule has the benefit of
avoiding a redundant implicit search. This helps performance and makes a
meaningful debug output, because it removes repetitive "Looking for an
implicit rule..." and "No implicit rules found..." for each .d file.
So, i prefer rules like
++++
%.d:;
%.h:;
----
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?61226>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
