> Are the chances better to extend the tool “remake” then? … > Probably.
Can it be that our software development resources are also too limited for mentioned tasks? > My intention was to provide profiling information by default … This is generally fine. Do any collaboration challenges hinder to achieve further improvements in this direction? > The dependency graphing feature was also present in the branches > I was planning to upstream since it allowed me to check > if the dependencies in our build system were incorrect from a logical PoV > (started with a sequential build) This information sounds promising. Did you clarify any remaining open issues with involved maintainers (in the background)? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
