> Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 20:17:50 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org> > Cc: bug-make@gnu.org > > > From: Paul Smith <psm...@gnu.org> > > Cc: bug-make@gnu.org > > Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 12:56:48 -0400 > > > > On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 19:36 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > However, I wonder what was the reason for splitting the definition of > > > GMK_EXPORT in two, and putting each part in a different file. > > > > Well, because the gnumake.h file is intended to be installed into the > > user's /usr/include or similar, and included in a binary package build > > of make such as RPM or DEB or whatever, and be included by the user's > > code, and when it's included there it should NEVER (IIUC) be using the > > in-make variant. > > That's true, but it's common to have the same header be included when > building the application or library which provides the exported > services. > > > However, if you really want it back the way it was please do choose a > > more unique name than "MAIN". Something prefixed with "GMK_" at least. > > OK, will do.
Done. _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
