> From: Paul Smith <psm...@gnu.org> > Cc: reinp...@win.tue.nl, bug-make@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 09:04:24 -0400 > > you may see this: > > xa > xb > a > $(MAKE) foo > xc > xd > b
If "a" appears before "xb", then that's all I ask for. > > If we want it to be "no worse", then why do we need it at all, let > > alone have it turned on by default? I thought -O should actually > > improve something, so "no worse" is too weak to describe that, IMO. > > Obviously we gain synchronized output. It's not synchronized. It's just has a coarser granularity than what we get without -O. IOW, the chunks are larger, but still interlaced in somewhat random order. > I believe we can get to the point where anyone who can read and > understand parallel output can even more easily read and understand the > output from -O. I'd surely like to get there ;-) _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
