On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 09:52 -0800, Lawrence Ibarria wrote: > I do like this suggestion, feels quite clean!
I implemented the "write" side of this proposal and committed it to CVS, along with regression tests and documentation. The "read" side is slightly more work but I can do this one too if people want it. I'm not sure there's much advantage to it over $(shell cat <file>) as this is unlikely to be a performance bottleneck. Although from a portability and implementation alignment point of view it would be useful. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Smith <psm...@gnu.org> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.mad-scientist.net "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
