> Although this could be a bug, it's more likely, IMO, that your > target/prerequisite requirements are not correctly stated. > > For example, it could be that you use slightly different paths so that > make doesn't realize these two libraries are really the same thing, and > the dependencies aren't being propagated properly. No. The paths to the libraries are the same (like I said, the files are machine generated.). > > Try running make with the -p option so it prints its internal database. > Are the prerequisites you expect to see for somedir/libfoo.so really > there? Yes. > > Try running the parallel version with -d (redirect the output because > it's voluminous) and see what make says about trying to build > somedir/libfoo.so: what does it say about the somedir/libbar.so > prerequisite? That it does not exist, so it fails. But if run not-parallel, it correctly identifies it must be built first.
_______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
