Le 2 mai 2011 à 16:07, Paul Smith a écrit : Hi Paul!
> So, the circular dependency issue is because of this: > >> %.eps: %.pdf >> >> %.eps %.pdf: %.dat > > In the second rule you say that BOTH %.eps and %.pdf can be built from > %.dat, and in the first rule you say that %.eps can be built from %.pdf. > So make has two different ways to build %.eps, and one of them lists as > a prerequisite a co-target in the other rule. Make is rightly confused > here. I'm confused in understanding why it's rightly confused :/ But maybe my confusion is, as Edward pointed out, because I am misled by the term "circular dependency", as really, I can't see any here. _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make