On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 12:21 -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > > the old rule has 1 target (or multiple identical targets) > > and > > there exists a target in the new rule the same as the old rule's target > > > > See attached makefile which demonstrates this. Is that the correct > > behaviour? It seems like it would make more sense to compare the > > target lists for equality. > > I think it should match any rule whose target list is a subset of the new > rule's list, without regard to order.
I agree this seems like the correct behavior. I worry that it's too inefficient. It could be made much more efficient, though, if we were allowed to sort the target patterns. Although obviously we can't sort the prerequisite patterns, and we'll still need to match those. In theory this should be fine, since the order in which they're specified shouldn't make any difference. In practice, though, make seems to have behavior which depends on the order: not all the targets are treated equally unfortunately. There is at least one bug filed against make on this point. There is one other efficiency which will be available soon: to solve another bug filed against GNU make on behalf of gcc (make uses too much memory) I'm finishing up a major change to use the string cache for all filenames in make. Once that's done, we can replace many of the strcmp's with simple pointer comparisons. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
