Eric, thank to be kind enough for your help.
I keep trying to figure out why with the same set of m4 files, result
are different.
Thank.
Le 20/09/2013 20:25, Eric Blake a écrit :
On 09/20/2013 12:11 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
I further note that 'feature/oleane-name.m4' is not specified on the
command line, but that you didn't list the contents of m4/cf.m4; if
there is any caching, it is most likely happening in the m4 code
embedded in m4/cf.m4 has changed between the two machines you are
testing on, rather than a bug in m4 itself.
In fact, I'm convinced of that fact. I just downloaded
sendmail-cf-8.14.7-1.fc19.noarch, and in m4/cf.m4, I see:
ifdef(`_CF_DIR_', `',
`ifelse(__file__, `__file__',
`define(`_CF_DIR_', `../')',
`define(`_CF_DIR_',
substr(__file__, 0, eval(len(__file__) - 8)))')')
divert(0)dnl
ifdef(`OSTYPE', `dnl',
`include(_CF_DIR_`'m4/cfhead.m4)dnl
In other words, the authors of sendmail are DELIBERATELY parsing
__file__ and then constructing an absolute path to pass to include(),
rather than passing a relative path and relying on a path lookup. (I
cringe at the way they are doing it; they are NOT very robust to
arbitrary file names; and I could totally cause things to go haywire by
installing cf.m4 into a directory whose name includes m4 macros - but it
happens to work for their typical installation locations)
--
Serge ABIDAL - serge.abi...@orange.com
Orange Business Services FT/SCE/CSO/ITD/DIH/CIE/SSP
13 rue de Javael
75015 Paris
tel. (33) 1 53 95 11 23
