Bruno Haible wrote: > It could be that the buffer that is too small is this 'buf' here, not > something in glibc. Does the buffer overflow persist if you increase > its size from 100 to 1000000, and/or if you use asprintf instead of sprintf?
Size of 10000 seems to work. Size of 1000 doesn't. Using asprintf also seems to not crash with a size of 100. Regards Greg _______________________________________________ Bug-m4 mailing list Bug-m4@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-m4