> In contrast to Jean, I have a different point of view. I think it > would be *very* valuable to have documentation strings of *all* > functions that might be useful in the long run
Oh, that's also my point of view — it *would* be very valuable.
Just... IMO not realistic. It already took me weeks to write
the extending-lilypond guide (not counting the effort to understand
the code base in the first place). "rg '```\{func\}' | wc -l" tells
me that currently 76 functions are documented in the guide, so the
multiplier to get more usable documentation for all functions that
are already documented is already ~10, and there are the undocumented
ones also.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
