Putting the function inside a bookpart's paper block causes it to have no effect.
- Nikolai On Wed, Sep 7, 2022, 19:34 Jean Abou Samra <j...@abou-samra.fr> wrote: > Le 08/09/2022 à 01:31, Nikolai Hedler a écrit : > > Hello, > > > > When attempting to determine the correct usage of "first-page-number" in > a > > (fairly complex) project, I first found that it did nothing at all - even > > with absurd inputs (e.g. first-page-number = asdf) it changed nothing and > > the compiler carried on silently - no errors, warnings, or other > > indications of mistakes. I was able to figure out how to use it correctly > > (although the documentation is slightly sparse), but I think there should > > be some sort of notification when a function is misplaced or otherwise > > ignored. > > > Do you have an example? > > There are lots and lots of ways in which you can do things that > don't really make sense, including things that don't make sense > with vanilla LilyPond but start to make sense if you put some Scheme > code to support them, so such a warning is not feasible in general, > although it can be possible in some specific instances. > _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
