Am Sa., 30. Mai 2020 um 00:08 Uhr schrieb Valentin Villenave
<valen...@villenave.net>:
>
> On 5/29/20, Pierre Perol-Schneider <pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Simone,
> > A basic solution:
> > \relative c' {
> > \stemUp
> > \override Fingering.staff-padding = #'()
> > <c-1 e-2 g-3 b-5>4 <g'-\tweak extra-offset #'(-.1 . -4.3) -0>8 <g'>
> > }
>
> Sure there are workarounds, but: shouldn’t we be treating this as a
> bug? There’s no obvious reason why unsetting staff-padding should be
> ignored on a beamed note and not on an unbeamed note.
>
> %%%%
>
> \relative c' {
> \stemUp
> \override Fingering.staff-padding = #'()
> <c-1 e-2 g-3 b-5>4 <g'-0>8
> }
>
> \relative c' {
> \stemUp
> \override Fingering.staff-padding = #'()
> <c-1 e-2 g-3 b-5>4 <g'-0>8 <g'>
> }
>
> %%%%
>
> I can’t find a glyph small enough to trigger it with other grobs
> (a.k.a StringNumber, Script or anything else), so I can’t tell if it’s
> limited to fingerings.
>
> Cheers,
> -- V.
>
> _______________________________________________
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Fingering.add-stem-support is per default set to 'only-if-beamed'
Try:
\override Fingering.add-stem-support = #'()
and it'll work
HTH,
Harm
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
