Am 06.09.18 um 21:39 schrieb foxfanfare:
Malte Meyn-3 wrote
The result (using LilyPond 2.19.82) is exactly what I would’ve expected.
I suppose your expectation is different so what did you expect?
The automatic subdivised beam is 16th instead of 8th.
Ok, now after a closer look I see that the problem is not *where* the
beams are subdivided but *how*. That’s a bug, yes, see Urs’s reply.
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
