On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Federico Bruni <f...@inventati.org> wrote:
> Hi Aaron > > > Il giorno gio 24 mag 2018 alle 22:30, Aaron Laws <dartm...@gmail.com> ha > scritto: > > The documentation at >> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/setting >> -the-staff-size >> makes it sound like set-global-staff-size and layout-set-staff-size only >> differ in their scope (the former affects the whole book, and the latter >> only the score pertaining to a particular layout). Attached is a Tiny >> Example using set-global-staff-size. Reproduction steps: >> 1. Compile the example to "global.pdf". >> 2. Move the comment from line 4 to line 2 >> 3. Compile the modified example to "layout.pdf" >> If the documentation is correct, I would expect set-global-staff-size and >> layout-set-staff-size to work the same when there is only one staff. >> Comparing the resulting global.pdf and layout.pdf shows that this is not >> the case. >> >> I have a book with two \scores in it, and would like one to have a larger >> set-global-staff-size than the other. I'll continue experimenting and see >> if I can get what I want, but I thought I would drop a note about this. >> > > I can reproduce your problem in 2.18.2 but not in 2.19.81. > So it seems it's been fixed. Can you confirm? > > Latest development release is here: > http://lilypond.org/downloads/binaries/ > Oh, I see! I use arch linux, so I generally take for granted that I'm running the latest version. I see that our repositories are sorely out of date with respect to lilypond: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/lilypond/ Thank you for the pointer, I'll see if I can verify the fix. In Christ, Aaron Laws _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
