Carl Sorensen-3 wrote > On 4/23/18, 1:30 PM, "Torsten Hämmerle" <
> torsten.haemmerle@ > > wrote: > > But why \once? > If generally all cancellations collide, you may well use a general > \override. > > Because all cancellations don't collide; only the cancellations of flats > collide. Noeck wrote > Because the cancellation of sharps looks fine (to my eye) and does need > the extra padding. (Or is that another misunderstanding on my side?) OK, that's a point... I was rather thinking of an optically uniform spacing - In my opinion, if both cancellations of flats and cancellations of sharps occur in a piece, I wouldn't like to cancellations of sharps give a compressed overall impression compared to cancellations of flats. But, of course, whatever we can do in the current LilyPond version will be a compromise of some sort. All the best, Torsten -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Bugs-f58488.html _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
