Hi Carl,
Carl Sorensen-3 wrote
> Why do you think issue 3766 is different from your observation? Both are
> a collision between the tuplet bracket and the accidentals.
I thought it could be a different issue because the minimal example in that
bug report requires the tuplet bracket position to be different than the
default (by using \override TupletBracket.direction = #UP), while the
examples I gave are all done with default positions. But actually it's
possible to reproduce it without this override by something like this:
{
\times 4/4 { d' d' fis'' fis'' }
}
So yeah, I suppose in the end it's the same issue.
Cheers,
Gilberto
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/tuplets-and-accidentals-collision-tp192293p192296.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
