Hi Harm, Hi All, (1) Ok, for deleting.
(2) Those were drafts, even without description. I forgot to work on them. (3) I don't know. In France there is some rights for copying few measures in an article if sources is clearly stated (which I did) (4) same as (2) Please delete, too complicate. (5) Did you notice I've changed the design ? Thank you Harm, Cheers to All, Pierre 2016-04-02 14:53 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com>: > Hi all, > > after far to long laziness in approving lsr-snippets, I used > spring-break to go through them. Most are approved now, sometimes with > more or less heavy editing. > Though, there are few left, where I'm not sure how to deal with. > All by Pierre, thus cc-ing him. > > (1) > "StaffGroup bracket with a variable length (path)" > http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=989 > > This one is obviously a construction helper and the method is used in > "Repeat-bar-lines with angle-wings for whole StaffGroup (manually)" > http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=991 > > Though, why doing all from scratch and not using brackettips.up/down from > feta? > I see no point in keeping "StaffGroup bracket with a variable length > (path)" and vote for deleting it. > > Side-notes: > a) > We have > "Curly bracket with variable length (path)" > http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=988 > which indeed prints brackets different from feta, so I have no problem > with it. > This method is used in > "Orchestral grouping with a custom brace" > http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=986 > b) > Additionally I've uploaded > "Repeat-bar-lines with angle-wings for whole StaffGroup (automatic and > semi-automatic)" > http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=1032 > > > (2) > There are these two snippets: > > Instrument name as staff lines > http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=981 > > Instrument name as staff lines (alternative) > http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=983 > > Both lack of description. > Which one should I approve? Or even both? > > > (3) > "Squeeze and split staff" > http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=1005 > > It really demonstrates the full power of the path-command. > Though, it recodes an existing image. > > The original-pdf can be downloaded at > http://www.graphire.com/Pages/Framesets/framesmp.htm > click "Sample Output" -> "Fuqua"-example > > Is there a copyright-issue? > > > (4) > "Worksheet" > http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=922 > It demonstrates the use of markup-commands and fullfills the > snippet-description, nothing more. > Worth keeping/approving it? > > (5) > "Eyeglasses as markup (path)" > http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=982 > > It was already discussed at: > http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/LSR-eyeglasses-snippet-td179471.html > Though again, any point in keeping it? > I'd vote for deleting it. > > > I'd love to have some feedback how to proceed with the above mentioned > snippets. > > > Thanks, > Harm > _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
