Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes: > 2015-11-07 0:06 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: >> >> Ok, got it. >> >> It's only offset-fret which does the damage? > > Just investigating offset-fret. > At first glance the return-values seem to be ok...
Hey, I said I got it. Just testing the patch before uploading. The problem is that offset-fret modifies its argument destructively, using list-set! on individual sublists. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
