Hi James,
Sorry that I have not been able to open the section you linked to the "big
html" version of the docs or test variations of the bug at the moment,
since I'm away from home. But I am relatively convinced this depends on
using numerals vs. not using numerals in the time signature.
Thanks,
Ophir
On Oct 26, 2015 1:56 PM, "James" <p...@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 25/10/15 18:01, Ophir Lifshitz wrote:
>
> Yes, I believe that in those cases the time signature uses the "c" symbol
> instead of numerals.
>
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Federico Bruni <f...@inventati.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Il giorno dom 25 ott 2015 alle 18:26, Ophir Lifshitz <
>> hangfromthefl...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>>
>>> Sorry if the paste was unclear. I intended to show two minimal examples,
>>> where the first one works, but the second one (with \time 2/4 added) does
>>> not work.
>>>
>>
>> It seems that any fraction whose division is not 1 triggers the error?
>>
>> This works fine:
>> echo '\version "2.18.0" { \time 2/2 a4 }' | lilypond -dbackend=svg
>> -dsvg-woff -o foo -
>>
>> This doesn't:
>> echo '\version "2.18.0" { \time 3/4 a4 }' | lilypond -dbackend=svg
>> -dsvg-woff -o foo -
>>
>> Same problem on 2.19.29
>>
>>
>>
>>
> So does that mean if you use 4/4 it will also not fail?
>
> We have the 2 types of 'C' common-time glyphs in Feta
>
>
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation-big-page#time-signature-glyphs
>
> However (and I am not a music expert) if you have a time sig of 1/1 or 5/5
> those will also work as there is no 'c' glyph for those representations.
>
> James
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
