On 22.09.2015 18:47, tisimst wrote:
On 9/22/2015 10:43 AM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:
tisimst <[hidden email]
</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=181539&i=0>> writes:
On 9/22/2015 9:42 AM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:
Pierre Perol-Schneider <[hidden email]
</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=181534&i=0>> writes:
I'm not top posting
Hi Squad,
When many grace notes, staves are miss aligned:
%%%%%%%%%%
\version "2.19.27"
\transpose c c' {
\repeat unfold 16 { e'8 a }
R1*8
}
\transpose c c' {
\repeat unfold 16 { \grace dis'8 e' \grace gis8 a }
R1*8
}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Huh? That example demonstrates that measures with many grace notes in
them will take more space than _independently_ typeset measures
without
the grace notes in them.
Which is not surprising at all. What is the misalignment you are
talking about?
I think this is what he meant (first as separate scores, then in the
same score):
The notes line up, but the second system doesn't break/compress like it
should.
- Abraham
fbbigajb.png (87K)
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/attachment/181536/0/fbbigajb.png>
Well, stuff lines up perfectly on my system. So where's the difference?
64-bit system vs 32-bit (the latter would be mine)? Different fonts
(less likely)?
Sounds like it might be OS-specific. I'm on Windows 7, 64-bit, LilyPond
2.19.27, using default fonts.
Everything fine with me:
Ubuntu 14.04, 64-bit, Lily 2.19.27, default fonts as well.
Yours, Simon
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
