Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes: > 2015-08-18 22:32 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com>: >> >> This not entirely true. >> >> It happens when the first note is the same as the turning point.
Yeah, I'd have expected that to be the significance of c. > I tried to patch autochange.scm with: [...] > If I didn't overlook something, the autochange related regtests look > ok. But I didn't do make check so far (it's late and it lasts too long > on my not so powerful laptop) > > Though, I have the feeling it cures the symptom not the underlaying > problem. I think that my patch on issue 4569 likely cures the problem. Curing the symptom is likely achieved by starting with a context change regardless of whether one is necessary. No idea whether that's what your patch would be doing. I think that the _problem_ is completely leaving the original context hierarchy (which almost magically is avoided with other start notes by _starting_ with the first context change which likely is performed by the autochange iterator _before_ any simultaneous creation of contexts). -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
