markdblackwell <markdblackwel...@gmail.com> writes:
> If a user passes a wrong bar number to \barNumberCheck, LilyPond 2.19.22
> produces a Scheme error:
>
>>lilypond tiny-example.ly
> GNU LilyPond 2.19.22
> Processing `tiny-example.ly'
> Parsing...
> Interpreting
> music...C:/progra/lilypond/current/usr/share/lilypond/current/ly/music-functions-init.ly:220:24:
> In procedure ly:input-warning in expression (ly:input-warning (*location*)
> "Barcheck failed got ~a expect ~a" ...):
> C:/progra/lilypond/current/usr/share/lilypond/current/ly/music-functions-init.ly:220:24:
> Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting Input): #f
>
> Tiny-example.ly contains the following code:
>
> \version "2.19.18" % Please ignore this version number!
> notes = {
> c'2 d'
> \barNumberCheck #3
> }
> \book {
> \bookOutputName "barNumberCheck-tiny-example-test"
> \score {
> \notes
> \layout { }
> }
> }
Now I would have like to have complained about the non-minimality of the
example since the book appears entirely unnecessary.
But indeed without the book, only a warning (with a ludicrous error
location) occurs. It is interesting that the behavior of normal score
and book differ in that respect.
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
