James Lowe wrote > ... > Or add a note in the documentation in the appropriate place? > > James > > _______________________________________________ > bug-lilypond mailing list
> bug-lilypond@ > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond I think, adding to the documantion is good enough. Perhaps my words on the 'concept of the \postscript markup' are not the best ones (esp. for people without deeper postscript experience), but this information should be a good start for a documentation. Maybe an image can illustrate some of the 'embeding conditions'. If you use 'findfont ... show' you do not need to insert a 'newpath' before. If you define a postscript subroutine which 'stroke's or 'fill's a path, it is always wise to include the 'newpath' into your postscript subroutine. So, I'm NOT missing an 'emptied stroke path' at all. ArnoldTheresius -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/PostScript-circle-printed-with-unwanted-line-tp175881p176235.html Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
