% Default behaviour of stopping hairpins at bar line
% looks rather bad if time or key changes between
%
% Couldn't find any reference on the Gould book, but
% I think it is rather ugly. The property of course is simple
% to adjust, so it is not that large a problem.
%
% The question is that does this always look ugly, and can the ugliness be
easily predicted?
% What do you think?
\version "2.19.18"
{
c'1 \<
c' \f
\bar "||"
c'1 \<
\time 2/4
c'2 \f
\bar "||"
c' \<
\key g \major
c' \f
\bar "||"
c' \<
\key des \major
\time 16/8
c' \f
}
2015-05-06 10:06 GMT+03:00 James Lowe <p...@gnu.org>:
> On 06/05/15 00:01, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > <
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/common-notation-for-vocal-music#multiple-syllables-to-one-note
> >
> > has an example covering the use of LyricTie with Italian text. Using the
> > same feature with German text (and probably other languages too), or
> > more accurately, with multiple syllables of the same word, requires
> > overriding word-space, so I suggest to add the following after the
> > current example (i.e. after line 611/12 in vocal.itely, unless I’m
> > mistaken):
> >
> > "
> > If the syllables belong to one word, it is necessary to override
> > word space.
> >
> > @lilypond[quote,ragged-right,verbatim,relative=2]
> > <<
> > {
> > \cadenzaOn
> > a4 a g c b8[( a]) b4 a2 \breathe
> > \bar "" \break
> > a4 c d4. c8 d4 e c2
> > }
> > \addlyrics {
> > Er ging aus der Kam -- mer sein,
> > dem
> > \markup \override #'(word-space . 0)
> > \tied-lyric #"kö~nig" -- li -- chen
> > Saal so rein,
> > }
> >>>
> > @end lilypond
> > "
> >
> > Best regards, Simon
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > bug-lilypond mailing list
> > bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
>
>
> Thanks Simon, is there any reason
>
> 1. We require the \cadenzaOn (for the sake of simplifying the example as
> much as possible in the doc
>
> 2. Is it *always* necessary to override the word space in the case of
> when syllables belong to one word or is this
>
> i. a specific type of case
> ii, are there any other ways to do this without using an '\override'
> (again for the sake of a more complete explanation and perhaps
> additional example)
>
> Regards
>
> James
>
> _______________________________________________
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
>
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
