On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Dan Eble <d...@faithful.be> wrote: > Knute Snortum <ksnortum <at> gmail.com> writes: > > > Just my two cent's worth: > > > > Adding an "n" modifier isn't saying that C Sharp is C Natural, it's an > > assertion. "Yes, I really mean natural. No, I didn't just forget the > > sharp." > > That sounds like a benefit, but I would think that people who value > "cn" for that reason would prefer a language definition that did not > include plain "c", so that Lilypond would not even produce output > based on such an error. > > The "cn" would be used presumably to reflect the fact that the output will have a natural sign. Requiring that C in C major be notated as "cn"--if I'm understanding you correctly--doesn't make sense.
--David _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
