I've added the issue: https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3801
we'd better continue the discussion there 2014/1/11 Eluze <elu...@gmail.com> > Phil Holmes-2 wrote > > The removal of the snippet is worth an issue. > > > > The updating/removal of the snippet - which do people think is better? > > imo it's worth to mention that you can force the opening repeat bracket to > show. > > > > another topic is the behavior of rehearsal marks with the first bar line to > print: > > with an explicit \bar "..." the rehearsal mark is placed right above this > bar - without it seems attached to the clef (which looks ugly)! > > repeatBarAtbeginningNew.ly > < > http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n157608/repeatBarAtbeginningNew.ly > > > > < > http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n157608/repeatBarAtbeginningNew.png > > > > should we discuss if an empty bar should be inserted automatically? > > Eluze > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/NR-1-4-1-printing-a-repeat-sign-at-the-beginning-of-a-piece-ly-is-obsolete-since-2-18-tp157541p157608.html > Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > bug-lilypond mailing list > bug-lilypond@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond > _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
