Hi all, > Just be completely clear, appending \arpeggio as Thomas demonstrated > (thanks, Thomas) not only "solves" it, it is actually the documented and > correct usage of \arpeggio. > > From the Notation Reference: > > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-as-lines#arpeggio > > where it says: > > "An arpeggio on a chord (also known as a broken chord) is denoted by > appending \arpeggio to the chord construct" > > So, no bug here.
Makes sense — sorry for the noise! Thanks, Kieren. _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
