Eluze writes:
> with the following code
>
> \version "2.17.4"
> \paper { line-width = #30 indent=0 ragged-right=##f}
> melody = \relative \repeat unfold 3 { c1 \break }
> verseone = \lyricmode {
> \set stanza = \markup \with-color #cyan "1."
> \set shortVocalName = #"short 1"
> _ one one
> }
> versetwo = \lyricmode {
> \set stanza = "2."
> \set shortVocalName = \markup \with-color #red "short 2"
> two
> \markup \with-color #green
> twooooooo _
> }
> \score {
> <<
> \new Staff \melody
> \addlyrics \verseone
> \addlyrics \versetwo
>
> >>
> }
>
> you get testx.png
> <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n142735/testx.png>
Thanks for the report, Eluze. I had a look at that png and compared it
with your comments.
>
> 1 - in the first system, the stanza of verseone is printed but shifted
> vertically because it fits between the clef and the first note and there is
> no lyric text (imo the stanza should be ommitted here like the
> shortVocalName of versetwo in the 3rd system - that seems to be the correct
> way)
>
> 2 - the shortVocalName of versetwo collides with the barnumber of the 3rd
> system
>
> 3 - for some reason the text of versetwo is not centered on the note
I could not see a second stanza in your png. I think the second stanza
of the third example has been cropped off the preview, perhaps?
> bug squad: should we raise 3 trackers or is it better to keep them
> together!?
Just one tracker for now. The devs can break it out as they see fit.
Cheers,
Colin Hall
Bug squad
--
Colin Hall
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
