On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 11:56:37PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: > On 10/03/2012 10:36 PM, Graham Percival wrote: > >We are not going to sign up bug-lilypond to receive notices > >automatically. Most reports will not be useful, and they will > >screw up the automatic tools we use to keep track of whether > >reports have been dealt with or not. > > I also don't think that the volume is ever going to be large enough > to be problematic. If it _is_, then you have a different problem -- > large numbers of bug reports that are not getting where they need > to.
ok, so you won't mind volunteering to take care of this with your personal email account. > >If you think those notices are worthwhile, then *you* sign up to > >receive them, and send any good bug reports to bug-lilypond. > > If I do this, and they _do_ prove useful, will you reconsider the > option of automated tracking? No. You're being inconsistent. At some point, any bug report needs to be evaluated by a human. We have enough problems finding humans to look at the dedicated, high-quality bug reports sent to bug-lilypond. If you don't think that looking for more bug reports will be a lot of work, then go ahead and do it yourself. If you *do* think that looking for bug reports will be a lot of work, then stop trying to foist that off onto other people. - Graham _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
