Dr. Chubb,
Your comment that an appoggiatura should only be one note seems to disagree
with the LilyPond documentation:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/music-glossary/appoggiatura
>From my point of view on the Bug Squad, this doesn't appear to be a bug
unless perhaps someone feels that the documentation should be revised
somehow.
Best Wishes,
Mark
Bug Squad
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Peter Chubb <peter.ch...@nicta.com.au>wrote:
> >>>>> "Nick" == Nick Payne <nick.pa...@internode.on.net> writes:
>
> Nick> The example below builds without error and gives the output I
> Nick> want. However, if I include articulate.ly, then the output is
> Nick> garbaged even though I haven't used \unfoldRepeats \articulate,
> Nick> and I get the following warnings in the log:
>
> That's because you have a two-note argument to \appogiature. Use
> \grace instead --- an appogiatura should only be one note. Articulate
> changes the default meaning of appoggiatura so the ornament steals
> time from the principal note not the preceding note.
>
> Nick> /home/nick/lilypond/examples/test.ly:8:59: warning: already have
> Nick> a beam \times 4/6 { a32[( g) fis( g) \appoggiatura { fis16 [ g]
> Nick> } a32 g] } warning: cannot end slur warning: unterminated slur
>
> --
> Dr Peter Chubb peter.chubb AT
> nicta.com.au
> http://www.ssrg.nicta.com.au Software Systems Research
> Group/NICTA
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-u...@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
