Hello, On 13 March 2012 22:39, Trevor Daniels <t.dani...@treda.co.uk> wrote: > > Eluze, you wrote Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:22 PM > > >> why is the Time_signature_engraver not called Time_engraver - or what >> rules >> are used in constructing names? > > > I don't know. These names were first devised almost 10 years ago, > well before I discovered LilyPond. But one possibility is because one > often uses "key" and "key signature" interchangeably when talking > loosely, but one never hears "time" as an alternative to "time signature". > > >> I'm not sure about making this an issue… > > > James likes to have issues raised for doc changes,
I do only because I can (and do) miss the email requests for doc enhancements - my inbox is full enough as it is trying to keep up with potential snippets and/or general doc improvements. Tracker numbers are cheap. I also tend to batch-fix all the small requests in one 'sitting' this is a much more efficient use of my time. Anyway, this is now pushed to staging. Should be in 2.15.34 http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=c69a9437979b012b766f94ef4ec45f9c2eac645d -- -- James _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
