Hello, 2012/2/1 Robin Bannister <r...@dataway.ch>
> In > http://code.google.com/p/**lilypond/issues/detail?id=**2026#c32<http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2026#c32>Ian > Hulin wrote: > >> This is fixed if we move the definition of the \null markup to the before >> the empty-markup declaration and change empty-markup to >> (define-public (empty-markup) >> make-null-markup)) >> ... >> It's built the docs successfully and run reg-tests OK. >> > > > OK, the docs say \null markup is an "empty markup", merely a single point, > but it has _position_, which empty-markup does not. > The following snippet demonstrates this difference: > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% > offset = \markup \translate #'(9 . 9) "offset" > \markup \line { "concat with empty-markup:" \box \concat { \empty-markup > \offset } " concat with null markup: "\box \concat { \null \offset } > } > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% > Is this a bug report? I am not sure; 2026 is still open, is it not better to add a coment to the issue? Marek Klein, bug squad _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond