Updates:
Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-new
Comment #20 on issue 1477 by reinhold...@gmail.com: suppress output for
expected warnings
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1477
I have now uploaded a new patch:
http://codereview.appspot.com/5037046/
I have changes the system a bit: Now a ly:expect-warning call corresponds
to exactly ONE warning output (which is also required, otherwise a warning
for a missing warning will be printed!). If the same warning is supposed to
be triggered multiple times, one has to call ly:expect-warning multiple
times.
I have now also updated all regtests that are supposed to display warnings.
All those warnings are now checked (but not printed to the console). If one
of those warnings is missing, a warning will be printed.
With that patch, only warnings that are not supposed to be there will be
printed to the console.
Unfortunately, this means that a "make check" will show lots of changes,
namely a lot of warnings will no longer be displayed.
On the other hand, the output of a normal regtest run will only show those
warnings that are not expected, so any warning that is there points to a
problem and should be fixed.
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
