Comment #3 on issue 1884 by jma...@gmail.com: Warnings from simultaneous
slurs with parallel music
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1884
I'd argue the regression isn't {printing a warning} instead of {silently
dropping notation}. Rather, it's {printing a warning in a reasonable and
documented use of \partcombine} instead of {*not* printing a warning in a
reasonable and documented use of \partcombine}".
It might not be a regression in the context of simple simultaneous music
(really, this goes over my head, I won't judge.) But with \partcombine it's
a documented use [1] that used to compile flawlessly, and now warns.
"Used to work/doesn't anymore" is my definition of a regression. YMMV :-)
Any suggestions on how to work around and/or fix?
[1] For example use in the documentation, see the "Selected snippets"
example in the "Automatic part combining" of the Notation Reference:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/multiple-voices.html#automatic-part-combining
and http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/5a/lily-75d8dfd0.ly
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
