"Bertrand Bordage" <bordage.bertr...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:cae7-6udnowlhzt+6cc-t9m8lohmsoctq2xmjwj7jvdxbrbo...@mail.gmail.com...
Hi again,
There's a small defect in autobeaming:
%%%
\markup "This:"
\relative c'' { \time 3/4 a4. b8 c d e d c b4. a8 b c d c b a2. }
\markup "looks like 6/8:"
\relative c'' { \time 6/8 a4. b8 c d e d c b4. a8 b c d c b a2. }
\markup "but should be like this:"
\relative c'' { \time 3/4 a4. b8\noBeam c d e d c\noBeam b4. a8 b c d c b
a2. }
%%%
Unfortunately, I don't think this can be easily fixed with the current
system.
Regards,
Bertrand
Gardner Read gives the "correct" beaming pattern for 3/4 to be 6 beamed
quavers, so the implication is that any available quavers are beamed. Gotta
say that seems wrong to me, but can we wait until a beaming guru comments
before raising this as an issue?
--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
