On Fri 08 Jul 2011, 00:14 Nicolas Sceaux wrote: > Le 7 juil. 2011 à 12:13, lilyp...@googlecode.com a écrit : > > > > > Comment #3 on issue 1747 by brownian.box: parallelmusic problem: q-notation > > does not work in \relative > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1747 > > > > Probably, this is the issue of chord repetition in relative mode: > > > > \version "2.15.4" > > > > % should be identical: > > \new Voice { > > \relative c'' { <c a> g, q q } > > \relative c'' { <c a> g, <c a> q } > > } > > Could you explain why the two ought to be identical? > From what `q' is for (*repeating* a chord), reading this snippet I'd conclude > that they shall produce different results, as the repeated chord is not the > same > in both cases (the second <c a> does not have the same octave as the first > one). > > `q' is not a textual macro. It is really for repeating the very same chord > (with > the same octave). I deduced that .)
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/single-voice.html#chord-repetition "The chord repetition symbol always remembers the last instance of a chord so it is possible to repeat the most recent chord even if other non-chorded notes or rests have been added since." I am not sure, thought. Please, don't mind. I should test it more in relative mode, probably. > [1747 is indeed a duplicate for 1110, but this is orthogonal from the > above case.] Thank you! -- Dmytro O. Redchuk Bug Squad "Easy to use" is easy to say. --Jeff Garbers _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
