On Sun 24 Apr 2011, 18:51 Valentin Villenave wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:47 PM, m...@apollinemike.com > <m...@apollinemike.com> wrote: > > That said, the following code still produces the same message: Hi, Valentin!
Yes, indeed, sorry for so late reply .) > Greetings everybody, hi Mike, > > Since there's a lot of activity wrt beaming code these days, I'm > wondering whether the possible regression I mentioned earlier is > likely to evolve (for better or for worse), and/or if I'd better open > a tracker page about it. (Or perhaps it could be related to #1613 or > #1619, for all I know.) Now there is 1702, "Unaesthetic beam slope", which reflects this situation, I believe: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1702 I mean that including into your code this \override \override StaffGrouper #'staff-staff-spacing #'basic-distance = #10.5 causes message to disappear. -- Dmytro O. Redchuk Bug Squad "Easy to use" is easy to say. --Jeff Garbers _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
