On 4/2/11 5:07 PM, "Carl Sorensen" <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote:
> On 4/2/11 3:51 PM, "Valentin Villenave" <valen...@villenave.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi Carl, hi everybody,
>>
>> time-signature-settings.scm, line 46 et seq.:
>>
>> ;;; If an exception is specified for a given beam-type, it will apply to
>> all
>> ;;; beams of shorter durations that don't have an individual exception,
>> so
>> ;;; ((1 . 8) . (3 3 2))
>> ;;; will cause all primary beams to be broken at 3/8, 5/8, and 8/8.
>>
>> Shouldn't it read "3/8, 6/8, and 8/8"?
>
> Yes, absolutely.
>
> Thanks for the catch.
Fixed in git.
Carl
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
