Comment #15 on issue 1294 by pnorcks: Version 2.13.35 does not properly
represent lyric tie
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1294
After further testing (on a GNU/Linux system) with the lyric tie example
from comment 2, here is a PostScript header comparison:
2.12.3:
%%DocumentSuppliedResources: font CenturySchL-Roma
%%DocumentSuppliedResources: font DejaVuSans
%%DocumentSuppliedResources: font Emmentaler-20
2.13.48:
%%DocumentSuppliedResources: font CenturySchL-Roma
%%DocumentSuppliedResources: font Emmentaler-20
%%DocumentSuppliedResources: font Sazanami-Mincho-Regular
And a comparison of dependency versions:
2.12.3:
Fontconfig 2.7.3
Ghostscript 8.70
Pango 1.26.0
2.13.48:
Fontconfig 2.8.0
Ghostscript 8.70
Pango 1.26.0
So, it looks like the next step is to figure out what changed in Fontconfig
between 2.7.3 and 2.8.0 that might cause less-than-desirable font selection.
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
