On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:33:23PM +0000, Graham Percival wrote: > On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 12:17:55AM +0100, Valentin Villenave wrote: > > (Or possibly open a new issue about it; we should also consider > > making it a High-prio, since I doubt we want to release a new > > stable version with that much of a performance drop.) > > Correctness is more important than speed.
Clarifying: I have no problem with you adding a priority-medium issue for the performance drop. In fact, since it's not related to 1211, we really _should_ have a separate issue for that, so that we don't lose Neil's nice benchmarks once 1211 is closed. However, it's not a consideration for blocking a stable release. - Graham _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
